PALESTINIANS scored a diplomatic triumph today when Pope
Francis landed in Palestine and called the stalemate in peace talks
“unacceptable.”
He immediately stopped to pray in front of the Israeli apartheid wall under a spray-painted slogan calling for a Free Palestine.
Previous popes always went to the West Bank after first arriving at Tel Aviv in Israel.
Pope Francis, however, landed in Bethlehem from Jordan and
immediately headed into a meeting with Palestinian President Mahmoud
Abbas.
Standing alongside President Abbas, the Pope declared:
“The time has come to put an end to this situation, which has become
increasingly unacceptable.”
He said both sides needed to make sacrifices to create two states with internationally recognised borders.
“The time has come for everyone to find the courage to be generous and creative in the service of the common good,” he said.
In reply, President Abbas voiced his concerns about the
recent breakdown in US-backed peace efforts and lamented the
difficulties facing the Palestinians.
He listed a series of complaints against Israel, including
continued settlement construction, the plight of thousands of
Palestinian prisoners, Israel’s control of east Jerusalem and Israel’s
construction of the “ugly wall.”
“Your visit is loaded with symbolic meaning as a defender of the poor and marginalised,” Mr Abbas said.
“We welcome any initiative from you to make peace a reality.”
Palestinian officials welcomed the Pope’s decision to
arrive in Bethlehem rather than Tel Aviv and to refer to the “state of
Palestine.”
In its official programe, the Vatican referred to Mr
Abbas as the president of the state of Palestine and his Bethlehem
office as the presidential palace.
That he came straight from Jordan to Bethlehem without
going through Israel was tacit recognition of a Palestinian state said
Hanan Ashrawi, who is a Christian and a senior official in the Palestine
Liberation Organization.
At the start of his weekly cabinet meeting, Israeli Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the visit “an opportunity to present
the real Israel — the advanced, modern, tolerant Israel.”
As he spoke, about 8,000 police were deployed in Jerusalem and 320 closed-circuit surveillance cameras monitored the old city.
Israel and the apartheid analogy is a comparison between Israel's treatment of the Palestinians and South Africa's treatment of non-whites during its apartheid era.
Israel's Wall in the West Bank, the separation fence and its impact on Palestinians, with maps, photos, and over 600 reports about the apartheid barrier in Palestine.
Israel – worse than apartheid
Editor
Gilad Atzmon writes:
The Israeli newspaper Haaretzreported
today that the Israeli army admitted earlier this week using live-fire
zones in order to expel Palestinians from areas in the West Bank.
Military training in live-fire zones in the West Bank is
used as a way of reducing the number of Palestinians living nearby, and
serves as an important part of the campaign against Palestinian illegal
construction, an army officer revealed at a recent Knesset committee
meeting.
Colonel Einav Shalev, operations officer of Central Command, told the
Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defence Committee that the goal of
preventing “illegal” construction is one of the main reasons the Israeli
army has recently increased its training in the Jordan Valley.
A Palestinian man inspecting the remains of his tent
The Jewish state is not an apartheid apparatus! it is actually far
worse. Israel doesn’t attempt to exploit the Palestinians, it wants them
gone. Israel puts into action Nazi-like (lebensraum) ethnic cleaning tactics because Jewish nationalism is an expansionist ideology driven by judeo-centric racist supremacy.
The truth is simple and devastating. However, the diaspora Jewish
left’s attempts to conceal it all is actually embarrassing, yet
symptomatic.
…but
that does not alter the fact that the large majority of surviving Jews
in the world is of Eastern European — and thus perhaps mainly of Khazar —
origin. If so, this would mean that their ancestors came not from the
Jordan but from the Volga, not from Canaan but from the Caucasus, once
believed to be the cradle of the Aryan race; and that genetically they
are more closely related to the Hun, Uigur “
This
book traces the history of the ancient Khazar Empire, a major but
almost forgotten power in Eastern Europe, which in the Dark Ages became
converted to Judaism. Khazaria was finally wiped out by the forces of
Genghis Khan, but evidence indicates that the Khazars themselves
migrated to Poland and formed the cradle of Western Jewry…
The
Khazars’ sway extended from the Black Sea to the Caspian, from the
Caucasus to the Volga, and they were instrumental in stopping the Muslim
onslaught against Byzantium, the eastern jaw of the gigantic pincer
movement that in the West swept across northern Africa and into Spain.
In
the second part of this book, “The Heritage,” Mr. Koestler speculates
about the ultimate faith of the Khazars and their impact on the racial
composition and social heritage of modern Jewry. He produces a large
body of meticulously detailed research in support of a theory that
sounds all the more convincing for the restraint with which it is
advanced. Yet should this theory be confirmed, the term “anti-Semitism”
would become void of meaning, since, as Mr. Koestler writes, it is based
“on a misapprehension shared by both the killers and their victims. The
story of the Khazar Empire, as it slowly emerges from the past, begins
to look like the most cruel hoax which history has ever perpetrated.”
ArthurKoestler documents the Caucasian ancestry of Ashkenazim Jews.…TheThirteenthTribe. The Khazar Empire and its Heritage. ArthurKoestler.
Mr. Koestler speculates about the ultimate faith of the Khazars and
their impact on the racial composition and social heritage of modern
Jewry. He produces a large body of meticulously detailed research in
support of a theory that sounds all the more convincing for the
restraint with which it is advanced. Yet should this theory be
confirmed, the term “anti-Semitism” would become void of meaning, since,
as Mr. Koestler writes, it is based “on a misapprehension shared by
both the killers and their victims. The story of the Khazar Empire, as
it slowly emerges from the past, begins to look like the most cruel hoax
which history has ever perpetrated.
The
vast majority of Jews in the world is of Eastern European – and thus
perhaps mainly of Khazar – origin. If so, this would mean that their
ancestors came not from the Jordan but from the Volga, not from Canaan
but from the Caucasus, once believed to be the cradle of the Aryan race;
and that genetically they are more closely related to the Hun, Uigur
and Magyar tribes than to the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Should
this turn out to be the case, then the term “anti-Semitism” would become
void of meaning, based on a misapprehension shared by both the killers
and their victims. Maybe the two world wars and the Holocaust were
pretext for the New Khazaria or Israel hoax.The
story of the Khazar Empire, as it slowly emerges from the past, begins
to look like the most cruel hoax which history has ever perpetrated.(Arthur Koestler,
Old Khazaria existed from about 500 A.D. to about 1000 A.D.
Old Khazaria adopted the religion of Talmudic Judaism about 740 A.D.
Khazaria was reborn on May 14, 1948.
The most cruel hoax which man has ever perpetrated.
As
long as Apostate Israel (New Khazaria) exist…there will never be any
peace in the Middle East. Modern-day Jewry is of Eastern European/Aryan
descent and thus they are not Semitic. Let the truth be told everywhere.
Why should American Soldiers die to protect a Hoax?
When I entered the Prime Minister’s Office for my second
term, I was summoned to Washington. “Not one brick,” they told me
[referring to squatter colony construction in the occupied West Bank,
including East Jerusalem]. I was threatened specifically: “Not one
brick.” The pressure from the international community and the Americans
was enormous. I don’t think anyone in Israel was under such pressure.
And still, after five years on the job, we built a little more than “one
brick”. But the important thing is to do it in a smart way, in a quiet
way, without inflammatory statements.
Do you think it’s a problem for me to say, “I am a hero, I am strong,
I don’t care about anything, what do I care what the world says?’” I
don’t have any problem saying that, but it would be a lie. Whoever tells
you that doesn’t deserve to be prime minister; he is a populist. This
is not a feature leader. A leader knows to stand up to international
pressure by manoeuvring.
Imagine yourself standing on a hill overlooking the whole valley. You
get to see all the obstacles below from above – some from the right and
some from the left – and then when you walk down, you know exactly
where to go in order to avoid the obstacles. What matters is that we
continue to head straight toward our goal, even if one time we walk
right and another time walk left.
UK Black Students Campaign votes to boycott Israel
Editor
There’s been another setback for the apartheid state of Israel, this time in Britain.
The Black Students Campaign (BSC), which
represents over one million Asian, Caribbean, African and other ethnic
minority students, has voted by an overwhelming majority in favour of a
motion (see appendix below) calling for the boycott of, divestment from and sanctions against Israel.
The BSC is a self-governing sub-section of
the National Union of Students, which represents the majority of student
unions in Britain.
The motion, No. 403, commits the BSC to lobby
for an “academic boycott of Israeli universities”, to “support the
annual Israeli Apartheid Week initiative”, and advocates for divestment
from “key BDS [Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions] target companies,
including G4S, Veolia and Eden Springs”.
It also describes “Israeli expansion on
Palestinian land” as “a settler-colonial project, predicated on the
ethnic cleansing and expulsion of its indigenous people”.
Mindful of Israel’s persecution of its
Palestinian citizens, its occupation of Palestinian lands and its
history of aggression against its neighbours – in 1956, 1967, 1978,
1982, 2006, 2008 and 2012, among others – the motion slams the “ongoing
66-year long occupation of Palestine, Israel’s multitude of human rights
and international law violations, its flagrancy and unaccountability to
the international community”.
Slowly but surely, the world is waking up to the longest-running lie that is Israel.
We salute the Black Students Campaign for its principled stand on the side of justice.
JERUSALEM — Israel could become an apartheid state without the creation of a Palestinian state, former South African leader F.W. de Klerk said on Israeli television. De Klerk, the last president in his country under
Did The Roman Church Create Christianity and Jesus? Caesarsmessiah Who was Jesus?
Why is there no historic archaeological evidence of his existence?
Who wrote the Gospels?
Why were they written in Greek, rather than Hebrew or Aramaic?
How did the Christian religion come to be centered in Rome? Why were the
first Christian pope and earliest saints
all members of the Flavius Caesar
ruling family?
History of Christianity -
\ Who Was Serapis Christ - Who Invented The Serapis Cult
Americans understand that Memorial
Day, or "Decoration Day," as my parents called it, has something to
do with honoring the nation's war dead. It is also a day devoted to picnics,
road races, commencements, and double-headers. But where did it begin, who
created it, and why?
As a nation we are at war now, but
for most Americans the scale of death and suffering in this seemingly endless
wartime belongs to other people far away, or to people in other neighborhoods.
Collectively, we are not even allowed to see our war dead today. That was not
the case in 1865.
At the end of the Civil War the dead
were everywhere, some in half buried coffins and some visible only as
unidentified bones strewn on the killing fields of Virginia or Georgia.
Americans, north and south, faced an enormous spiritual and logistical
challenge of memorialization. The dead were visible by their massive absence.
Approximately 620,000 soldiers died in the war. American deaths in all other
wars combined through the Korean conflict totaled 606,000. If the same number
of Americans per capita had died in Vietnam as died in the Civil War, 4 million
names would be on the Vietnam Memorial. The most immediate legacy of the Civil
War was its slaughter and how remember it.
War kills people and destroys human
creation; but as though mocking war's devastation, flowers inevitably bloom
through its ruins. After a long siege, a prolonged bombardment for months from
all around the harbor, and numerous fires, the beautiful port city of
Charleston, South Carolina, where the war had begun in April, 1861, lay in ruin
by the spring of 1865. The city was largely abandoned by white residents by
late February. Among the first troops to enter and march up Meeting Street
singing liberation songs was the Twenty First U. S. Colored Infantry; their
commander accepted the formal surrender of the city.
Thousands of black Charlestonians,
most former slaves, remained in the city and conducted a series of
commemorations to declare their sense of the meaning of the war. The largest of
these events, and unknown until some extraordinary luck in my recent research,
took place on May 1, 1865. During the final year of the war, the Confederates
had converted the planters' horse track, the Washington Race Course and Jockey
Club, into an outdoor prison. Union soldiers were kept in horrible conditions
in the interior of the track; at least 257 died of exposure and disease and were
hastily buried in a mass grave behind the grandstand. Some twenty-eight black
workmen went to the site, re-buried the Union dead properly, and built a high
fence around the cemetery. They whitewashed the fence and built an archway over
an entrance on which they inscribed the words, "Martyrs of the Race
Course."
Then, black Charlestonians in
cooperation with white missionaries and teachers, staged an unforgettable
parade of 10,000 people on the slaveholders' race course. The symbolic power of
the low-country planter aristocracy's horse track (where they had displayed
their wealth, leisure, and influence) was not lost on the freed people. A New
York Tribune correspondent witnessed the event, describing "a
procession of friends and mourners as South Carolina and the United States
never saw before."
At 9 am on May 1, the procession
stepped off led by three thousand black schoolchildren carrying arm loads of
roses and singing "John Brown's Body." The children were followed by
several hundred black women with baskets of flowers, wreaths and crosses. Then
came black men marching in cadence, followed by contingents of Union infantry
and other black and white citizens. As many as possible gathering in the
cemetery enclosure; a childrens' choir sang "We'll Rally around the
Flag," the "Star-Spangled Banner," and several spirituals before
several black ministers read from scripture. No record survives of which
biblical passages rung out in the warm spring air, but the spirit of Leviticus
25 was surely present at those burial rites: "for it is the jubilee; it
shall be holy unto you… in the year of this jubilee he shall return every man
unto his own possession."
Following the solemn dedication the
crowd dispersed into the infield and did what many of us do on Memorial Day:
they enjoyed picnics, listened to speeches, and watched soldiers drill. Among
the full brigade of Union infantry participating was the famous 54th
Massachusetts and the 34th and 104th U.S. Colored Troops, who performed a
special double-columned march around the gravesite. The war was over, and
Decoration Day had been founded by African Americans in a ritual of remembrance
and consecration. The war, they had boldly announced, had been all about the
triumph of their emancipation over a slaveholders' republic, and not about
state rights, defense of home, nor merely soldiers' valor and sacrifice.
According to a reminiscence written
long after the fact, "several slight disturbances" occurred during
the ceremonies on this first Decoration Day, as well as "much harsh talk
about the event locally afterward." But a measure of how white
Charlestonians suppressed from memory this founding in favor of their own
creation of the practice later came fifty-one years afterward, when the
president of the Ladies Memorial Association of Charleston received an inquiry
about the May 1, 1865 parade. A United Daughters of the Confederacy official
from New Orleans wanted to know if it was true that blacks had engaged in such
a burial rite. Mrs. S. C. Beckwith responded tersely: "I regret that I was
unable to gather any official information in answer to this." In the
struggle over memory and meaning in any society, some stories just get lost
while others attain mainstream dominance.
Officially, as a national holiday,
Memorial Day emerged in 1868 when General John A. Logan, commander-in-chief of
the Grand Army of the Republic, the Union veterans organization, called on all
former northern soldiers and their communities to conduct ceremonies and
decorate graves of their dead comrades. On May 30, 1868, when flowers were
plentiful, funereal ceremonies were attended by thousands of people in 183
cemeteries in twenty-seven states. The following year, some 336 cities and
towns in thirty-one states, including the South, arranged parades and orations.
The observance grew manifold with time. In the South Confederate Memorial Day
took shape on three different dates: on April 26 in many deep South states, the
anniversary of General Joseph Johnston's final surrender to General William T.
Sherman; on May 10 in South and North Carolina, the birthday of Stonewall
Jackson; and on June 3 in Virginia, the birthday of Jefferson Davis.
Over time several American towns,
north and south, claimed to be the birthplace of Memorial Day. But all of them
commemorate cemetery decoration events from 1866. Pride of place as the first
large scale ritual of Decoration Day, therefore, goes to African Americans in
Charleston. By their labor, their words, their songs, and their solemn parade
of flowers and marching feet on their former owners' race course, they created
for themselves, and for us, the Independence Day of the Second American
Revolution.
The old race track is still there —
an oval roadway in Hampton Park in Charleston, named for Wade Hampton, former
Confederate general and the white supremacist Redeemer governor of South
Carolina after the end of Reconstruction. The lovely park sits adjacent to the
Citadel, the military academy of South Carolina, and cadets can be seen jogging
on the old track any day of the week. The old gravesite dedicated to the
"Martyrs of the Race Course" is gone; those Union dead were
reinterred in the 1880s to a national cemetery in Beaufort, South Carolina.
Some stories endure, some disappear, some are rediscovered in dusty archives,
the pages of old newspapers, and in oral history. All such stories as the First
Decoration Day are but prelude to future reckonings. All memory is prelude.
David W. Blight teaches American History at Yale University
where he is the director of the Gilder Lehrman Center for the Study of Slavery,
Resistance, and Abolition, the author of the Bancroft prize-winning Race and
Reunion: The Civil War in American Memory, and the forthcoming A Slave
No More: Two Men Who Escaped to Freedom, Including Their Narratives of Emancipation.
Donald Sterling attacked Magic Johnson for having AIDS on Anderson Cooper CNN interview.
Donald Sterling says Magic Johnson is a
bad example for the children of L.A. because of what he did to "get
A.I.D.S." back in the '90s ... and says he should be ashamed of
himself. In those days when he had those AIDS, I went to my synagogue and I prayed for him.
( Jeremiah Wright comment that AIDS was created in the laboratory for Genocide in Africa and the Black community))
Sterling made the comments to Anderson Cooper during his big CNN interview ... saying "To do what [Magic] did and then get A.I.D.S. ... I mean, come on."
For the record, Magic does not have A.I.D.S. -- but was diagnosed H.I.V. positive back in 1991.
Sterling continued his attack on Magic -- saying, "Big Magic Johnson ... what has he done? He's got A.I.D.S."
"What
kind of a guy goes to every city and has sex with every girl? Then he
catches H.I.V. ... is that someone we wanna respect and tell our kids
about? I think he should be ashamed of himself. I think he should go
into the background."
Sterling also said he believes
Magic tricked him into staying quiet in the days after TMZ Sports
published the original audio recording as part of a diabolical plot to
take over the Clippers.
Sterling also just called Anderson
Cooper a RACIST -- saying, "I think you have more of a plantation
mentality than I do ... and I think you're more of a racist than I am."
Sterling didn't explain why he believes Cooper is a racist.
Sterling
seems to be in denial about how the players feel about him -- saying
they still "love me." He says the media hates him.
As usual, the media quickly denounced his AIDS accusations as "conspiracy theory. ... Jeremiah Wright, the retiring pastor of Trinity, has been in the news for
On May 11, 1987, The London Times, one of the world's most respected newspapers, published an explosive article entitled, "Smallpox vaccine triggered AIDS virus." The story suggested the smallpox eradication vaccine program sponsored by the WHO was responsible for unleashing AIDS in Africa. Almost 100 million Africans living in central Africa were inoculated by the WHO. The vaccine was held responsible for awakening a "dormant" AIDS virus infection on the continent.
An advisor to the WHO admitted, "Now I believe the smallpox vaccine theory is the explanation for the explosion of AIDS." Robert Gallo, M,D., the co-discoverer of HIV, told The Times, "The link between the WHO program and the epidemic is an interesting and important hypothesis. I cannot say that it actually happened, but I have been saying for some years that the use of live vaccines such as that used for smallpox can activate a dormant infection such as HIV." Despite the tremendous importance of this story, the U.S. media was totally silent on the report, and Gallo never spoke of it again.
In September 1987, at a conference sponsored by the National Health Federation in Monrovia, California, William Campbell Douglass, M.D., bluntly blamed the WHO for murdering Africa with the AIDS virus. In a widely circulated reprint of his talk entitled "W.H.O. Murdered Africa" , he accused the organization of encouraging virologists and molecular biologists to work with deadly animal viruses in an attempt to make an immunosuppressive hybrid virus that would be deadly to humans. From the Bulletin of the World Health Organization (Volume 47, p.259, 1972), he quoted a passage that stated: "An attempt should be made to see if viruses can in fact exert selective effects on immune function. The possibility should be looked into that the immune response to the virus itself may be impaired if the infecting virus damages, more or less selectively, the cell responding to the virus." According to Douglass, "That's AIDS. What the WHO is saying in plain English is Let's cook up a virus that selectively destroys the T-cell system of man, an acquired immune deficiency.'"
"Glaxo has sponsored at least four medical trials since 1995 using Hispanic and black children at Incarnation. The documents give details of all clinical trials in the US and reveal the experiments sponsored by Glaxo were designed to test the 'safety and tolerance' of Aids medications, some of which have potentially dangerous side effects. Glaxo manufactures a number of drugs designed to treat HIV, including AZT. "
UK firm tried HIV drug on orphans
MUST READ: The house that AIDS built
Human experiments - in the 'free world'?
"Glaxo has sponsored at least four medical trials since 1995 using Hispanic and black children at Incarnation. The documents give details of all clinical trials in the US and reveal the experiments sponsored by Glaxo were designed to test the 'safety and tolerance' of Aids medications, some of which have potentially dangerous side effects. Glaxo manufactures a number of drugs designed to treat HIV, including AZT. "UK firm tried HIV drug on orphans
MUST READ: The house that AIDS built By Liam ScheffThis brave article deals with pharmaceutical abuse in a children's home in NYC
It was through Maggiore that I met Mona, whose children, Sean and Dana, have tested HIV-positive. By the state's definition, they're not actually her children; Mona is their great aunt and legal guardian. Her niece, a long-time drug user, was unable to act as a responsible mother, so Sean and Dana were remanded to state foster care. Mona took them back to raise as her own.
When I first spoke with Mona, she was stressed and nervous. Sean had twice been sent to the Incarnation Children's Center (ICC), a "home for HIV positive children" located in Washington Heights. First, as an infant, then again four years ago. And Dana was there until June.
"Why did they take her?" I asked.
"They said I was a negligent parent because I didn't want to give the drugs."
She'd been taking Sean and Dana to a naturopath. That the children were healthy didn't matter. When city agencies found out that the children weren't on the drugs, they took them away for mandatory treatment at a clinic and then transferred them to ICC. There, they were locked up and pumped full of drugs day and night.
"What drugs?"
"AZT, Nevirapine, Epivir, Zerit. All kinds of drugs."
NA IROBI, (LifeSiteNews.com) - Wangari Maathai, a Kenyan ecologist and the first African woman to win a Nobel prize, said Saturday that HIV was created deliberately in the laboratory as a biological weapon. "Some say that AIDS came from the monkeys, and I doubt that because we have been living with monkeys (since) time immemorial, others say it was a curse from God, but I say it cannot be that," she said at a press conference following the announcement of her receipt of the Nobel prize. Maathai received the prize for her environmental work in preventing deforestation in Africa.
"It's true that there are some people who create agents to wipe out other people. If there were no such people, we could have not have invaded Iraq," Maathai maintained, as reported by the AFP. "We invaded Iraq because we believed that Saddam Hussein had made, or was in the process of creating agents of biological warfare," she said. "In fact it (the HIV virus) is created by a scientist for biological warfare."
"Why has there been so much secrecy about AIDS? When you ask where did the virus come from, it raises a lot of flags. That makes me suspicious," she said.
"She said (HIV/AIDS) was invented as a bio-weapon in some laboratory in the West," a U.S. State Department official said in response to Maathai's claim. "We don't agree with that." The U.S. official pointed out that Maathai had claimed HIV was created in the lab for the purposes of population control, in a Kenyan daily Standard newspaper story published in August.
AIDS Created as Biowarfare, Says Nobel Laureate
The first African woman to win the Nobel Peace Prize, Wangari Maatha of
Kenya, spoke out on the AIDS virus saying it was man-made and
deliberateloy
created as a weapon of biowarfare."In fact it (the HIV virus) is created
by a scientist for biological warfare,” she said. "Why has there been
so
much secrecy about AIDS? When you ask where did the virus come from, it
raises a lot of flags. That makes me suspicious,” Maathai said.The Kenya
based East Africa Standard reported that in response to questions from
Asian and European media, she said, "I want to dedicate the prize the
African
woman.
I want to hold and embrace her. She has suffered so much and I feel
this is an honour to her."Although I am a biologist, I have not done any
research. I may not be able to say who developed the (HIV) virus but it
was meant to wipe out the Black race," she continued."When she first
blamed
the HIV/Aids on 'some sadistic scientists, Professor Maathai kicked a
storm, leaving some experts outraged and others supporting her," the
Standard
reported.
"Initially, said Maathai, HIV/Aids was only concentrated in selected
spots in the continent, only afflicting the 'undesirable classes.' She
insisted that some scientists from the developed world deliberately
researched and developed the virus in order to "punish the Blacks".
- See more at: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread201079/pg1#sthash.xHMgxEoT.dpuf
Rockefeller, Nazis, Israel, Rothschild, The UN, & Genocide ... the sons and daughters of the elite ... the Planned Parenthood and Rockefeller connection to AIDS ...
Dec 19, 2011 – Christmas is a gift from God. AIDS patients are rejected by their families, beaten even. Children are starved for love and life. A wife expresses ...
0041-Rhodes Scholars and One World Government – The Elite Lead the One World ... 01- United States Roll in the Creation of AIDS – Genocide Plan; 010 – Illuminati Datase
From the Official U.S. Govt. Documents House of Rep.
AIDS as a weapon of warThu Jun 28 10:59:13 2001
While I do believe that AIDS is a weapon being used by the Federal Fraud Machine (FFM) and its allies, I disagree that it is a contagious disease caused by a little retrovirus, many types which exist in the normal human system. There are hundreds of well known doctors, microbiologists, professors, laymen who have proved that AIDS is not caused by HIV but by drugs end/or other immuno suppresive factors. AIDS is really a psyop weapon that actually gets "the AIDS victim" to kill him or herself. Rather than go into a lengthy and detailed explanation, I suggest you visit www.duesberg.com or aidsmyth.com or virusmyth.com. The AIDS dissidents like Dr. Duesberg, Professor of Microbiology at UC, Kerry Mullis, Noble Prize winner for the PCP test, Walter Gilbert of Harvard, Dr. Charlie Thomas formally at John Hopkins and Harvard, and many others get almost no publicity for their views. Dr. Duesberg has paid for his views by losing a $3 million research contract plus almost all of his other non professor revenues. As he told me "If I would come out and say that maybe HIV is partially responsible for AIDS, I could be paid like an NBA star, like Gallo (who stole the HIV virus from Montagnier) is currently. Now I'll just have to get by on my tenured professor salary." Most of the biological research at Fort Detrick has been bogus and led nowhere. Yet, a lot of people and companies continue to get rich with such research.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 1970
United States Senate Library
HEARINGS before a SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Ninety-First Congress
First Session
Subcommittee on Department of Defense
George H. Mahon, Texas, Chairman
Robert L.F. Sikes, Florida, Glenard P. Lipscomb, California
Jamie D. Whitten, Mississippi William E. Minshall, Ohio
George W. Andrews, Alabama, John J. Rhodes, Arizona
Daniel J. Flood, Pennsylvania Glenn R. Davis, Wisconsin
John M. Slack, West Virginia, Joseph P. Addabbo, New York
Frank E. Evans, Colorado
Temporarily assigned H.B. 15090
PART 5
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION
Department of the Army
Statement of Director, Advanced Research Project Agency
Statement of Director, Defense Research and Engineering
__________
Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON : 1969
UNITED STATES SENATE LIBRARY
129
TUESDAY, JULY 1, 1969
SYNTHETIC BIOLOGICAL AGENTS
There are two things about the biological agent field I would like to mention. One is the possibility of technological surprise. Molecular biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly and eminent biologists believe that within a period of 5 to 10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired.
MR. SIKES. Are we doing any work in that field?
DR. MACARTHUR. We are not.
MR. SIKES. Why not? Lack of money or lack of interest?
DR. MACARTHUR. Certainly not lack of interest.
MR. SIKES. Would you provide for our records information on what would be required, what the advantages of such a program would be. The time and the cost involved?
DR. MACARTHUR. We will be very happy to. The information follows:
The dramatic progress being made in the field of molecular biology led us to investigate the relevance of this field of science to biological warfare. A small group of experts considered this matter and provided the following observations:
1. All biological agents up the the present time are representitives of naturally occurring disease, and are thus known by scientists throughout the world. They are easily available to qualified scientists for research, either for offensive or defensive purposes.
2. Within the next 5 to 10 years, it would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon when we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.
3. A research program to explore the feasibility of this could be completed in approximately 5 years at a total cost of $10 million.
4. It would be very difficult to establish such a program. Molecular biology is a relatively new science. There are not many highly competent scientisis in the field., almost all are in university laboratories, and they are generally adequately supported from sources other than DOD. However, it was considered possible to initiate an adequate program through the National Academy of sciences - National Research Council (NAS-NRC, and tentative plans were made to initiate the program. However decreasing funds in CB, growing criticism of the CB program., and our reluctance to involve the NAS NRC in such a controversial endeavor have led us to postpone it for the past 2 years.
It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaked lest it lead to yet another method of massive killing of large populations. On the other hand, without the sure scientific knowledge that such a weapon is possible, and an understanding of the ways it could be done. there is little that can be done to devise defensive measures. Should an enemy develop it there is little doubt that this is an important area of potential military technological inferiority in which there is no adequate research program.
Population And The American Future
The Report Of The Commission On Population Growth And The American Future
John D. Rockefeller 3rd, Chairman March 27, 1972
"Letter of Transmittal"
Commission on Population Growth and the American Future 726 Jackson Place, N. W. Washington, D. C. 20506
March 27, 1972
To the President and Congress of the United States:
I have the honor to transmit for your consideration the Final Report, containing the findings and recommendations, of the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future, pursuant to Sec. 8, PL 91-213.
After two years of concentrated effort, we have concluded that, in the long run, no substantial benefits will result from further growth of the Nation’s population, rather that the gradual stabilization of our population through voluntary means would contribute significantly to the Nation’s ability to solve its problems. We have looked for, and have not found, any convincing economic argument for continued population growth. The health of our country does not depend on it, nor does the vitality of business nor the welfare of the average person.
The recommendations offered by this Commission are directed towards increasing public knowledge of the causes and please="" acknowledge="" and="" use="" a="" link="" to="" website<="" hide="">consequences of population change, facilitating and guiding the processes of population movement, maximizing information about human reproduction and its consequences for the family, and enabling individuals to avoid unwanted fertility.
To these ends we offer this report in the hope that our findings and recommendations will stimulate serious consideration of an issue that is of great consequence to present and future generations.
Respectfully submitted for the Commission, John D. Rockefeller 3rd, Chairman
The President The President of the Senate The Speaker of the House of Representatives
The Commission
Chairman John D. Rockefeller 3rd
Vice Chairman Grace Olivarez Executive Director, Food for All, Inc.
Vice Chairman Christian N. Ramsey, Jr., M.D.
President, The Institute for the Study of Health and Society
Joseph D. Beasley, M.D. The Edward Wisner Professor of Public Health Tulane University Medical Center
David E. Bell Executive Vice President, The Ford Foundation
Bernard Berelson President, The Population Council
Arnita Young Boswell Associate Field Work Professor School of Social Service Administration, University of Chicago
Margaret Bright Professor, Dept. of Behavioral Sciences and Dept. of Epidemiology School of Hygiene and Public Health The Johns Hopkins University
Marilyn Brant Chandler Housewife, Volunteer, Student
Paul B. Cornely, M.D. Professor, Dept. of Community Health Practice, College of Medicine Howard University Assistant to the Executive Medical Officer Welfare and Retirement Fund United Mine Workers of America
Alan Cranston United States Senator California
Lawrence A. Davis
President, Arkansas Agricultural, Mechanical & Normal College
It is hard to believe the public law that authorized AIDS will be thirty one years old next week. Even more remarkable, that in a score and a half, no one has ever read it!
On March 16, 1970, following significant world events both in medicine and politics, President Richard Milhouse Nixon signed into law the U.S. policy to protect America's future by "stabilizing" the population of Sub-Sahara Africa. The history leading to the politics is relevant in our further presentation of the "research logic" Flow Chart of the federal virus program.
On April 4, 1969, President Richard Nixon did not want to be late. He had been there many times before, but today was special. He wanted the scientific and medical communities from around the world to hear and see his presence as our military scientists and doctors announced, 'they could effectively make AIDS.' It was Fort Detrick, Maryland and the ethnic nature of the work would not be printed until November '70.
Unbeknownst to the American people, the Special Virus program had been underway since November, 1961. In a real sense, the current trillion dollar 'tax' "give back" to U.S. taxpayers, is in essence the benefit of our sharpened ability to kill humans for a better tomorrow for our financial investment in our trust in God.
The 1971 Flow Chart proves the United States sought to co-mingle animal viruses (Visna) that had never before been seen in human disease. Thus, at what point did the population projections of Africa necessitate this "long standing secret virus program?" It appears that shortly after WW2, and the importation of the German (Operation Paperclip) and Japanese biological experts, the U.S. State Department wrote a top secret memo under the pen of George W. McKennan. The United States knew in 1948 it had to 'devise a scheme' to implant the German Visna in the human population and assist the Black population in copulating itself into extinction.
Why? Why? Why would the 'so-called' greatest "people-oriented" country in the history of the world have an Oz-like curtain behind which reveals a twisted, evil social structure so contrary to the very fabric of the core Constitutional foundations?
As Zbigniev Brezinski says in his classic 1978 National Security Council Memorandum #46: "Africa's resources remain our "highest priority""! (Translation: If we allow the Africans to use of all their own diamonds and gold, we won't have anything physical to show that we are not available for sex for others.)
So what we have done over the last fifty three years is come up with a way to make it appear that Africa's people are "sexually nasty". Thus African deaths are palatable. These people are dying solely because of their behavior. Sort of the same thing that happened to homosexuals.
In other words, we are going to secretly make AIDS and not tell you, so if you never stray from 'monogamous missionary', you won't have anything to worry about. Yeah, yeah, mr. government, please give us more concocted social skills tests that end in state death. Even though you can't see it now, we will all be crucified.
But as it was, Nixon helicoptered back down to the Wh--- House and got busy. They were going to do it. No more White on White crime, we are going to get those darkies. Adolph was wrong, why check for foreskins to determine who your enemy is when you need only look toward his (face).
Wasting no time to get to waste Blacks, in May 1969, Nixon authorized the United Nations Association of the United States of America to issue the first of the U.S. policy decisions carving out a U.S future world with Africa's resources void her people.
On June 9, The Pentagon informed the U.S. Congress and presto, there it is. The trickster's manifesto as to why we would quickly need something like AIDS (which we had just made).
President Nixon's "Special Message to the Congress on Problems of Population Growth" 7/18/69 is the crown jewel of the ideology of eugenics and racism. Again, though, who could possibly have known and have been able to see through this government matrix? Reflect back that we were distracted frequently throughout the entire decade of the 60's and 70's. Kennedy, King, Kennedy (KKK) and Vietnam.
A very strong case builds that the desire to introduce Visna (wasting) into humans is the direct result of the true tilt of the ethnic/social landscape to the detriment of racial and social minorities.
With Nixon's law authorizing eugenics czar, John D. Rockefeller, III to lead the charge to cull the Black population, the U.S. Congress is dog-tied from citizen overview of the Population Commission ("COMMISSION"). AIDS is official U.S. policy. However, it is only outlined until the end of the 20th Century. Our call for review is just, it is our union which is imperfect.
Join our petition call for immediate review of the 1971 Flow Chart and 15 progress reports of the U.S. federal virus program, the Special Virus.
By reviewing this program we conclude this is our best chance to most effectively and directly begin the universal collaboration to dismantle this synthetic biological agent we have come to call AIDS.
I see a brightening American and united world future, of course, band-aids of truth everywhere, and ultimately, a humanity on the mend.
Publisher’s Note: Since December 1, 2000, World AIDS Day, Boyd Graves, J.D. has launched a one man educational war on the true laboratory origin of AIDS. World medical and scientific comments reviewing Dr. Graves' work.