Tuesday, May 8, 2012

AIDS Created for Depopulation - Obama Endorse Gay Marriage - Reformers Reveal Anti-Christ

World AIDS Day

World AIDS DAY - EUGENICS AND DEPOPULATION

Torch of Truth International: AIDS/HIV: Bio-Weapon Virus for Depopulation

China Marks World AIDS Day | News | English

World Aids Day 2011: 'Inside Story: The Science of HIV/AIDS ...

World Aids day: 20 years of HIV data mapped | World news ...



On World AIDS Day, Doctor Says More Pediatrics AIDS Drugs Needed Voice of America - 21 hours agoBy Joe DeCapua HIV, theAIDS virus, not only infects adults, but also affects many children. Millions have become orphans, and many are infected at birth.

Worldwide AIDS & HIV Statistics Including Deaths

- 9:25pm
World HIV & AIDS epidemic statistics, including people infected with HIV and deaths from AIDS. 25 Million Dead

RegionAdults & children
living with HIV/AIDS
Adults & children
newly infected
Adult prevalence*Deaths of
adults & children
Sub-Saharan Africa22.4 million1.9 million5.2%1.4 million
North Africa & Middle East310,00035,0000.2%20,000
South and South-East Asia3.8 million280,0000.3%270,000
East Asia850,00075,000<0.1%59,000
Oceania59,00039000.3%2,000
Latin America2.0 million170,0000.6%77,000
Caribbean240,00020,0001.0%12,000
Eastern Europe & Central Asia1.5 million110,0000.7%87,000
North America1.4 million55,0000.4%25,000
Western & Central Europe850,00030,0000.3%13,000
Global Total33.4 million2.7 million0.8%2.0 million



33 million people live with HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. 190 countries around the world recognize this day to raise awareness that the battle is not over in the fight against the world’s number one health threat.
An International Conference on AIDs will be held in Africa, December 3 through 7.
In the U.S., the Black AIDS Institute is asking the Obama administration to set up a domestic funding program for HIV/AIDS prevention, according to BET.The institute says this is increasingly a black issue as about half of the over one million Americans living with HIV or AIDS are black.
Increasingly women and girls are finding themselves part of the growing numbers, with about 11 percent of newly reported AIDS cases contracted either through sex with infected men or injected drug use. African American woman accounted for 66 percent of the newly diagnosed cases in 2005, according to theCenters for Disease Control and Prevention.
The New York Times, in an editorial, says that the WHO developed a mathematical model predicting what would happen if most adults and adolescents were tested every year for the AIDS virus, and those who were positive were treated immediately with antiretroviral medications. The policy now is to use the drugs after your immune system is depresse



Do the Elite, through government and private sector scientists, create and distribute deadly viruses to world populations (more)
5.0

Dr Alan Cantwell


“Smallpox vaccine triggered AIDS virus.”

Smallpox vaccines triggered AIDS
On May 11, 1987, The London Times, one of the world’s most respected newspapers, published an explosive article entitled, “Smallpox vaccine triggered AIDS virus.” The story suggested the smallpox eradication vaccine program sponsored by the WHO was responsible for unleashing AIDS in Africa. Almost 100 million Africans living in central Africa were inoculated by the WHO. The vaccine was held responsible for awakening a “dormant” AIDS virus infection on the continent.
An advisor to the WHO admitted, “Now I believe the smallpox vaccine theory is the explanation for the explosion of AIDS.” Robert Gallo, M,D., the co-discoverer of HIV, told The Times, “The link between the WHO program and the epidemic is an interesting and important hypothesis. I cannot say that it actually happened, but I have been saying for some years that the use of live vaccines such as that used for smallpox can activate a dormant infection such as HIV.” Despite the tremendous importance of this story, the U.S. media was totally silent on the report, and Gallo never spoke of it again.
In September 1987, at a conference sponsored by the National Health Federation in Monrovia, California, William Campbell Douglass, M.D., bluntly blamed the WHO for murdering Africa with the AIDS virus. In a widely circulated reprint of his talk entitled “W.H.O. Murdered Africa” , he accused the organization of encouraging virologists and molecular biologists to work with deadly animal viruses in an attempt to make an immunosuppressive hybrid virus that would be deadly to humans. From the Bulletin of the World Health Organization (Volume 47, p.259, 1972), he quoted a passage that stated: “An attempt should be made to see if viruses can in fact exert selective effects on immune function. The possibility should be looked into that the immune response to the virus itself may be impaired if the infecting virus damages, more or less selectively, the cell responding to the virus.” According to Douglass, “That’s AIDS. What the WHO is saying in plain English is Let’s cook up a virus that selectively destroys the T-cell system of man, an acquired immune deficiency.’”
see in the ‘free world’?


“Glaxo has sponsored at least four medical trials since 1995 using Hispanic and black children at Incarnation. The documents give details of all clinical trials in the US and reveal the experiments sponsored by Glaxo were designed to test the ‘safety and tolerance’ of Aids medications, some of which have potentially dangerous side effects. Glaxo manufactures a number of drugs designed to treat HIV, including AZT. “
UK firm tried HIV drug on orphans
MUST READ: The house that AIDS builtin the ‘free world’?
“Glaxo has sponsored at least four medical trials since 1995 using Hispanic and black children at Incarnation. The documents give details of all clinical trials in the US and reveal the experiments sponsored by Glaxo were designed to test the ‘safety and tolerance’ of Aids medications, some of which have potentially dangerous side effects. Glaxo manufactures a number of drugs designed to treat HIV, including AZT. “
UK firm tried HIV drug on orphans
MUST READ: The house that AIDS built








Aids, Eugenics, and the Future ... up with two shattering exposes - "The Drug Story", and "The House of Rockefeller."
aidseugenics.blogspot.com/2007/12/truth-about.


Boyd Ed Graves, J.D. discovered the United States' secret 1971 Special Virus FlowChart in 1999 and changed the world forever.
www.boydgraves.com/flowchart


The History of the Development of AIDS
Chapter Excerpt from “State Origin: The Evidence of the Laboratory Birth of AIDS”
by Boyd E. Graves, J.D.


Boyd Graves (BG): The 1971 Flow Chart is the blueprint for the development of AIDS. It is the quintessential missing link document which provides absolute proof of the U ...
www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/Perspectives_1/AIDS_is.


The Rockefeller Foundation had long financed the eugenics movement in England ... about the Planned Parenthood and Rockefeller connection to AIDS and ...
educate-yourself.org/cn/genociderockefellernazis2apr03.shtml


The Rockefeller Foundation had long financed the eugenics movement in England, apparently ... about the Planned Parenthood and Rockefeller connection to AIDS and ..

... decisive role - former New York governor Nelson Rockefeller ... AIDS truth exposed: Un-cut exclusive footage from ... ... NWO Eugenics to Global Depopulation; Oligarchy's WWF Goal ..



About Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s AIDS Comment ” Think On These ThingsUNCENSORED ” Depopulation Linked Merck Announces African … 1970, President Nixon signed PL91-213 and John D. Rockefeller, III 95.10.52/racism/pooaa1. thinkonthesethings.wordpress.com/2008/03/17/about-rev-jeremiah-wrights-aids-comment/ - More from this site

down with murder inc In 1970, President Nixon signedPL91-213 and John D. Rockefeller, III became the ” TheAIDS Debate. The depopulation agenda part 1. Thedepopulation agenda www.declarepeace.org.uk/captain/murder_inc/site/aids.html-














From the Official U.S. Govt. Documents House of Rep.

AIDS as a weapon of war
Thu Jun 28 10:59:13 2001

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 1970
United States Senate Library

HEARINGS before a SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Ninety-First Congress
First Session
Subcommittee on Department of Defense
George H. Mahon, Texas, Chairman
Robert L.F. Sikes, Florida, Glenard P. Lipscomb, California
Jamie D. Whitten, Mississippi William E. Minshall, Ohio
George W. Andrews, Alabama, John J. Rhodes, Arizona
Daniel J. Flood, Pennsylvania Glenn R. Davis, Wisconsin
John M. Slack, West Virginia, Joseph P. Addabbo, New York
Frank E. Evans, Colorado
Temporarily assigned H.B. 15090
PART 5
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION
Department of the Army
Statement of Director, Advanced Research Project Agency
Statement of Director, Defense Research and Engineering
__________
Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON : 1969
UNITED STATES SENATE LIBRARY
129
TUESDAY, JULY 1, 1969
SYNTHETIC BIOLOGICAL AGENTS
There are two things about the biological agent field I would like to mention. One is the possibility of technological surprise. Molecular biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly and eminent biologists believe that within a period of 5 to 10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired.
MR. SIKES. Are we doing any work in that field?
DR. MACARTHUR. We are not.
MR. SIKES. Why not? Lack of money or lack of interest?
DR. MACARTHUR. Certainly not lack of interest.
MR. SIKES. Would you provide for our records information on what would be required, what the advantages of such a program would be. The time and the cost involved?
DR. MACARTHUR. We will be very happy to. The information follows:
The dramatic progress being made in the field of molecular biology led us to investigate the relevance of this field of science to biological warfare. A small group of experts considered this matter and provided the following observations:
1. All biological agents up the the present time are representitives of naturally occurring disease, and are thus known by scientists throughout the world. They are easily available to qualified scientists for research, either for offensive or defensive purposes.
2. Within the next 5 to 10 years, it would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon when we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.
3. A research program to explore the feasibility of this could be completed in approximately 5 years at a total cost of $10 million.
4. It would be very difficult to establish such a program. Molecular biology is a relatively new science. There are not many highly competent scientisis in the field., almost all are in university laboratories, and they are generally adequately supported from sources other than DOD. However, it was considered possible to initiate an adequate program through the National Academy of sciences – National Research Council (NAS-NRC, and tentative plans were made to initiate the program. However decreasing funds in CB, growing criticism of the CB program., and our reluctance to involve the NAS NRC in such a controversial endeavor have led us to postpone it for the past 2 years.
It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaked lest it lead to yet another method of massive killing of large populations. On the other hand, without the sure scientific knowledge that such a weapon is possible, and an understanding of the ways it could be done. there is little that can be done to devise defensive measures. Should an enemy develop it there is little doubt that this is an important area of potential military technological inferiority in which there is no adequate research program.
4. It would be very difficult to establish such a program. Molecular biology is a relatively new science. There are not many highly competent scientisis in the field., almost all are in university laboratories, and they are generally adequately supported from sources other than DOD. However, it was considered possible to initiate an adequate program through the National Academy of sciences – National Research Council (NAS-NRC, and tentative plans were made to initiate the program. However decreasing funds in CB, growing criticism of the CB program., and our reluctance to involve the NAS NRC in such a controversial endeavor have led us to postpone it for the past 2 years.
It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaked lest it lead to yet another method of massive killing of large populations. On the other hand, without the sure scientific knowledge that such a weapon is possible, and an understanding of the ways it could be done. there is little that can be done to devise defensive measures. Should an enemy develop it there is little doubt that this is an important area of potential military technological inferiority in which there is no adequate research program.

“Letter of Transmittal”
Commission on Population Growth and the American Future
726 Jackson Place, N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20506
March 27, 1972
To the President and Congress of the United States:
I have the honor to transmit for your consideration the Final Report, containing the findings and recommendations, of the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future, pursuant to Sec. 8, PL 91-213.
After two years of concentrated effort, we have concluded that, in the long run, no substantial benefits will result from further growth of the Nation’s population, rather that the gradual stabilization of our population through voluntary means would contribute significantly to the Nation’s ability to solve its problems. We have looked for, and have not found, any convincing economic argument for continued population growth. The health of our country does not depend on it, nor does the vitality of business nor the welfare of the average person.
The recommendations offered by this Commission are directed towards increasing public knowledge of the causes and please=”" acknowledge of population change, facilitating and guiding the processes of population movement, maximizing information about human reproduction and its consequences for the family, and enabling individuals to avoid unwanted fertility.
To these ends we offer this report in the hope that our findings and recommendations will stimulate serious consideration of an issue that is of great consequence to present and future generations.
Respectfully submitted for the Commission,
John D. Rockefeller 3rd, Chairman
The President
The President of the Senate
The Speaker of the House of Representatives


























AIDS baby born with heart outside stomach



AIDES Baby
youngest_preemie_baby_amillia



Population And The American Future
The Report Of The Commission On Population Growth And The American Future
John D. Rockefeller 3rd, Chairman
March 27, 1972


The Commission
Chairman

John D. Rockefeller 3rd
Vice Chairman

Grace Olivarez

Executive Director, Food for All, Inc.
Vice Chairman

Christian N. Ramsey, Jr., M.D.
President, The Institute for the Study of Health and Society
Joseph D. Beasley, M.D.

The Edward Wisner Professor of Public Health

Tulane University Medical Center
David E. Bell

Executive Vice President, The Ford Foundation
Bernard Berelson

President, The Population Council
Arnita Young Boswell

Associate Field Work Professor

School of Social Service Administration, University of Chicago
Margaret Bright

Professor, Dept. of Behavioral Sciences and Dept. of Epidemiology

School of Hygiene and Public Health

The Johns Hopkins University
Marilyn Brant Chandler

Housewife, Volunteer, Student
Paul B. Cornely, M.D.

Professor, Dept. of Community Health Practice, College of Medicine

Howard University

Assistant to the Executive Medical Officer

Welfare and Retirement Fund United Mine Workers of America
Alan Cranston

United States Senator

California
Lawrence A. Davis

President, Arkansas Agricultural, Mechanical & Normal College


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 1970 : The funding of the Bio-terrorism AIDS virus

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 1970 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS FIRST SESSION SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS H.B. 15090 PART 5 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION Department of the Army Statement of Director, Advanced Research Project Agency Statement of Director, Defense Research and Engineering Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1969 UNITED STATES SENATE LIBRARY [pg.] 129 TUESDAY, JULY 1, 1969 SYNTHETIC BIOLOGICAL AGENTS There are two things about the biological agent field I would like to mention. One is the possibility of technological surprise. Molecular biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly and eminent biologists believe that within a period of 5 to 10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired. MR. SIKES. Are we doing any work in that field? DR. MACARTHUR. We are not. MR. SIKES. Why not? Lack of money or lack of interest? DR. MACARTHUR. Certainly not lack of interest. MR. SIKES. Would you provide for our records information on what would be required, what the advantages of such a program would be, the time and the cost involved? DR. MACARTHUR. We will be very happy to. (The information follows:) The dramatic progress being made in the field of molecular biology led us to investigate the relevance of this field of science to biological warfare. A small group of experts considered this matter and provided the following observations: 1. All biological agents up the the present time are representatives of naturally occurring disease, and are thus known by scientists throughout the world. They are easily available to qualified scientists for research, either for offensive or defensive purposes. 2. Within the next 5 to 10 years, it would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease. 3. A research program to explore the feasibility of this could be completed in approximately 5 years at a total cost of $10 million. 4. It would be very difficult to establish such a program. Molecular biology is a relatively new science. There are not many highly competent scientists in the field. Almost all are in university laboratories, and they are generally adequately supported from sources other than DOD. However, it was considered possible to initiate an adequate program through the National Academy of Sciences – National Research Council (NAS-NRC). The matter was discussed with the NAS-NRC, and tentative plans were plans were made to initiate the program. However decreasing funds in CB, growing criticism of the CB program, and our reluctance to involve the NAS-NRC in such a controversial endeavor have led us to postpone it for the past 2 years. It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaken lest it lead to yet another method of massive killing of large populations. On the other hand, without the sure scientific knowledge that such a weapon is possible, and an understanding of the ways it could be done, there is little that can be done to devise defensive measures. Should an enemy develop it, there is little doubt that this is an important area of potential military technological inferiority in which there is no adequate research program. Funded for $10,000 000 12/8/69 (306 yes votes 330-no votes 33)

Joe Biden Comes Out For Gay Marriage Equality | Camels With ...


Moscow Jesuit Celebrates Ash Wednesday Service with Vice President

Obama: gay marriage should be legal

Barack Obama supports gay marriage
President speaks about issue in deeply personal terms and affirms his unequivocal support for same-sex couples to marry

Why Obama Decided To Endorse Same Sex Marriage

Obama Gay Marriage

Bush Official: 'Reminds Us That Marriage And Equality Are Universal Values'.. Mitt Reiterates Opposition











world aids day depopulation hiv virus news 20 adults many children infected statistics including deaths 9 & million africa 4 1 2 east 000 asia 3
most reformers papacy antichrist the since time it s rev 13 5 10 popular powerful just 3 martin luther founder church else than kingdom very for man sin son perdition but he his increases yet if god these have now many ages papal tyranny first pp john calvin i deny him vicar christ successor peter head some too roman pontiff those do bring same charge against paul himself whom speak whose language shall show 2 thessalonians any other which them vol 1 above and both followers called claiming highest power ten p king james bible popes destruction their pope makes men heaven saints earth more wyclif completed 1st why look seventh chapter daniel horn 4th because christians name therefore horns whole temporal having great one out high able change 7 8 25 quoted so lord said translated de william tyndale greek use doctrine good enough right devil 4 an answer works www information knox reformer should abolished over speaks in challenge no doubt letters melanchthon true without order ii says worship corpus 12 zwingli know might word world way volume following envoy magazine march april 98 cover article fiction patrick madrid special must see beast revelation verse wears crowns blasphemous names written numerical value adds up 666 official title latin vicarius filii dei add using get tiara emblazoned diamonds jewels t math even follow argument run numbers well especially seventhday adventists also here like such used v l 50 c 100 d 500 m 1000 letter u rendered exist would vicarivs don example come 2102 reason me there nor ever rome second including fabrication to real titles christi particular piece only fact none that never person making claim disputes facts ask furnish decree ecclesiastical conciliar statement catholic document calls referred won find may 2009 ix uses people evidence what response did white then could re answered ve made main give crown this events 14th century tiaras precious painting drawing museum possess across issue under prompta bibliotheca edition encyclopedia appears mine law hundreds years considered authority a scandal page represents fairness link yours historical senate military warning seal last days td jakes sabbath sermon cost christian is living every day dominion ex united states america commandment 20 keep holy 9 six shalt thou thy work within creator rested wherefore blessed ezek sabbaths sign between am sanctify ye 31 children israel throughout observe 7th saturday truth before sunday lucifer mankind destroy forgotten christianzionism council aids hiv adults infected & statistics deaths million africa east 000 asia