Origin of AIDS/HIV - Genocide or Experiment Gone Wrong
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 1970 : The funding of the Bio-terrorism AIDS virus
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 1970 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS FIRST SESSION SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS H.B. 15090 PART 5 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION Department of the Army Statement of Director, Advanced Research Project Agency Statement of Director, Defense Research and Engineering Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1969 UNITED STATES SENATE LIBRARY [pg.] 129 TUESDAY, JULY 1, 1969 SYNTHETIC BIOLOGICAL AGENTS There are two things about the biological agent field I would like to mention. One is the possibility of technological surprise. Molecular biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly and eminent biologists believe that within a period of 5 to 10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired. MR. SIKES. Are we doing any work in that field? DR. MACARTHUR. We are not. MR. SIKES. Why not? Lack of money or lack of interest? DR. MACARTHUR. Certainly not lack of interest. MR. SIKES. Would you provide for our records information on what would be required, what the advantages of such a program would be, the time and the cost involved? DR. MACARTHUR. We will be very happy to. (The information follows:) The dramatic progress being made in the field of molecular biology led us to investigate the relevance of this field of science to biological warfare. A small group of experts considered this matter and provided the following observations: 1. All biological agents up the the present time are representatives of naturally occurring disease, and are thus known by scientists throughout the world. They are easily available to qualified scientists for research, either for offensive or defensive purposes. 2. Within the next 5 to 10 years, it would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease. 3. A research program to explore the feasibility of this could be completed in approximately 5 years at a total cost of $10 million. 4. It would be very difficult to establish such a program. Molecular biology is a relatively new science. There are not many highly competent scientists in the field. Almost all are in university laboratories, and they are generally adequately supported from sources other than DOD. However, it was considered possible to initiate an adequate program through the National Academy of Sciences - National Research Council (NAS-NRC). The matter was discussed with the NAS-NRC, and tentative plans were plans were made to initiate the program. However decreasing funds in CB, growing criticism of the CB program, and our reluctance to involve the NAS-NRC in such a controversial endeavor have led us to postpone it for the past 2 years. It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaken lest it lead to yet another method of massive killing of large populations. On the other hand, without the sure scientific knowledge that such a weapon is possible, and an understanding of the ways it could be done, there is little that can be done to devise defensive measures. Should an enemy develop it, there is little doubt that this is an important area of potential military technological inferiority in which there is no adequate research program. Funded for $10,000 000 12/8/69 (306 yes votes 330-no votes 33)
AIDS/HIV: Bio-Weapon Virus for Depopulation of Africa
AIDS: 'The Manufactured Virus'
From the Official U.S. Govt. Documents House of Rep.
AIDS as a weapon of war
Thu Jun 28 10:59:13 2001
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 1970
United States Senate Library
HEARINGS before a SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Ninety-First Congress
First Session
Subcommittee on Department of Defense
George H. Mahon, Texas, Chairman
Robert L.F. Sikes, Florida, Glenard P. Lipscomb, California
Jamie D. Whitten, Mississippi William E. Minshall, Ohio
George W. Andrews, Alabama, John J. Rhodes, Arizona
Daniel J. Flood, Pennsylvania Glenn R. Davis, Wisconsin
John M. Slack, West Virginia, Joseph P. Addabbo, New York
Frank E. Evans, Colorado
Temporarily assigned H.B. 15090
PART 5
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION
Department of the Army
Statement of Director, Advanced Research Project Agency
Statement of Director, Defense Research and Engineering
__________
Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON : 1969
UNITED STATES SENATE LIBRARY
129
TUESDAY, JULY 1, 1969
SYNTHETIC BIOLOGICAL AGENTS
There are two things about the biological agent field I would like to mention. One is the possibility of technological surprise. Molecular biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly and eminent biologists believe that within a period of 5 to 10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired.
MR. SIKES. Are we doing any work in that field?
DR. MACARTHUR. We are not.
MR. SIKES. Why not? Lack of money or lack of interest?
DR. MACARTHUR. Certainly not lack of interest.
MR. SIKES. Would you provide for our records information on what would be required, what the advantages of such a program would be. The time and the cost involved?
DR. MACARTHUR. We will be very happy to. The information follows:
The dramatic progress being made in the field of molecular biology led us to investigate the relevance of this field of science to biological warfare. A small group of experts considered this matter and provided the following observations:
1. All biological agents up the the present time are representitives of naturally occurring disease, and are thus known by scientists throughout the world. They are easily available to qualified scientists for research, either for offensive or defensive purposes.
2. Within the next 5 to 10 years, it would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon when we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.
3. A research program to explore the feasibility of this could be completed in approximately 5 years at a total cost of $10 million.
4. It would be very difficult to establish such a program. Molecular biology is a relatively new science. There are not many highly competent scientisis in the field., almost all are in university laboratories, and they are generally adequately supported from sources other than DOD. However, it was considered possible to initiate an adequate program through the National Academy of sciences – National Research Council (NAS-NRC, and tentative plans were made to initiate the program. However decreasing funds in CB, growing criticism of the CB program., and our reluctance to involve the NAS NRC in such a controversial endeavor have led us to postpone it for the past 2 years.
It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaked lest it lead to yet another method of massive killing of large populations. On the other hand, without the sure scientific knowledge that such a weapon is possible, and an understanding of the ways it could be done. there is little that can be done to devise defensive measures. Should an enemy develop it there is little doubt that this is an important area of potential military technological inferiority in which there is no adequate research program.
4. It would be very difficult to establish such a program. Molecular biology is a relatively new science. There are not many highly competent scientisis in the field., almost all are in university laboratories, and they are generally adequately supported from sources other than DOD. However, it was considered possible to initiate an adequate program through the National Academy of sciences - National Research Council (NAS-NRC, and tentative plans were made to initiate the program. However decreasing funds in CB, growing criticism of the CB program., and our reluctance to involve the NAS NRC in such a controversial endeavor have led us to postpone it for the past 2 years.
It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaked lest it lead to yet another method of massive killing of large populations. On the other hand, without the sure scientific knowledge that such a weapon is possible, and an understanding of the ways it could be done. there is little that can be done to devise defensive measures. Should an enemy develop it there is little doubt that this is an important area of potential military technological inferiority in which there is no adequate research program.
"Letter of Transmittal"
Commission on Population Growth and the American Future
726 Jackson Place, N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20506
March 27, 1972
To the President and Congress of the United States:
I have the honor to transmit for your consideration the Final Report, containing the findings and recommendations, of the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future, pursuant to Sec. 8, PL 91-213.
After two years of concentrated effort, we have concluded that, in the long run, no substantial benefits will result from further growth of the Nation’s population, rather that the gradual stabilization of our population through voluntary means would contribute significantly to the Nation’s ability to solve its problems. We have looked for, and have not found, any convincing economic argument for continued population growth. The health of our country does not depend on it, nor does the vitality of business nor the welfare of the average person.
The recommendations offered by this Commission are directed towards increasing public knowledge of the causes and please="" acknowledge="" and="" use="" a="" link="" to="" website<="" hide="">consequences of population change, facilitating and guiding the processes of population movement, maximizing information about human reproduction and its consequences for the family, and enabling individuals to avoid unwanted fertility.
To these ends we offer this report in the hope that our findings and recommendations will stimulate serious consideration of an issue that is of great consequence to present and future generations.
Respectfully submitted for the Commission,
John D. Rockefeller 3rd, Chairman
The President
The President of the Senate
The Speaker of the House of Representatives
Population And The American FutureThe Report Of The Commission On Population Growth And The American Future
John D. Rockefeller 3rd, Chairman
March 27, 1972
John D. Rockefeller Family
The Commission
Chairman - John D. Rockefeller 3rd
Vice Chairman - Grace Olivare - Executive Director, Food for All, Inc.
Vice Chairman - Christian N. Ramsey, Jr., M.D. - President, The Institute for the Study of Health and Society
Joseph D. Beasley, M.D. The Edward Wisner Professor of Public Health - Tulane University Medical Center
David E. Bell - Executive Vice President, The Ford Foundation
Bernard Berelson - President, The Population Council
Arnita Young Boswell - Associate Field Work Professor - School of Social Service Administration, University of Chicago
Margaret Bright - Professor, Dept. of Behavioral Sciences and Dept. of Epidemiology School of Hygiene and Public Health - The Johns Hopkins University
Marilyn Brant Chandler - Housewife, Volunteer, Student
Paul B. Cornely, M.D. - Professor, Dept. of Community Health Practice, College of Medicine - Howard University
Assistant to the Executive Medical Officer
Welfare and Retirement Fund United Mine Workers of America
Alan Cranston - United States Senator - California
Lawrence A. Davis - President, Arkansas Agricultural, Mechanical & Normal College
AIDS as a weapon of war
Thu Jun 28 10:59:13 2001
United States Senate Library
HEARINGS before a SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Ninety-First Congress
First Session
Subcommittee on Department of Defense
George H. Mahon, Texas, Chairman
Robert L.F. Sikes, Florida, Glenard P. Lipscomb, California
Jamie D. Whitten, Mississippi William E. Minshall, Ohio
George W. Andrews, Alabama, John J. Rhodes, Arizona
Daniel J. Flood, Pennsylvania Glenn R. Davis, Wisconsin
John M. Slack, West Virginia, Joseph P. Addabbo, New York
Frank E. Evans, Colorado
Temporarily assigned H.B. 15090
PART 5
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION
Department of the Army
Statement of Director, Advanced Research Project Agency
Statement of Director, Defense Research and Engineering
__________
Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON : 1969
UNITED STATES SENATE LIBRARY
129
TUESDAY, JULY 1, 1969
SYNTHETIC BIOLOGICAL AGENTS
There are two things about the biological agent field I would like to mention. One is the possibility of technological surprise. Molecular biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly and eminent biologists believe that within a period of 5 to 10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired.
MR. SIKES. Are we doing any work in that field?
DR. MACARTHUR. We are not.
MR. SIKES. Why not? Lack of money or lack of interest?
DR. MACARTHUR. Certainly not lack of interest.
MR. SIKES. Would you provide for our records information on what would be required, what the advantages of such a program would be. The time and the cost involved?
DR. MACARTHUR. We will be very happy to. The information follows:
The dramatic progress being made in the field of molecular biology led us to investigate the relevance of this field of science to biological warfare. A small group of experts considered this matter and provided the following observations:
1. All biological agents up the the present time are representitives of naturally occurring disease, and are thus known by scientists throughout the world. They are easily available to qualified scientists for research, either for offensive or defensive purposes.
2. Within the next 5 to 10 years, it would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon when we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.
3. A research program to explore the feasibility of this could be completed in approximately 5 years at a total cost of $10 million.
4. It would be very difficult to establish such a program. Molecular biology is a relatively new science. There are not many highly competent scientisis in the field., almost all are in university laboratories, and they are generally adequately supported from sources other than DOD. However, it was considered possible to initiate an adequate program through the National Academy of sciences – National Research Council (NAS-NRC, and tentative plans were made to initiate the program. However decreasing funds in CB, growing criticism of the CB program., and our reluctance to involve the NAS NRC in such a controversial endeavor have led us to postpone it for the past 2 years.
It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaked lest it lead to yet another method of massive killing of large populations. On the other hand, without the sure scientific knowledge that such a weapon is possible, and an understanding of the ways it could be done. there is little that can be done to devise defensive measures. Should an enemy develop it there is little doubt that this is an important area of potential military technological inferiority in which there is no adequate research program.
4. It would be very difficult to establish such a program. Molecular biology is a relatively new science. There are not many highly competent scientisis in the field., almost all are in university laboratories, and they are generally adequately supported from sources other than DOD. However, it was considered possible to initiate an adequate program through the National Academy of sciences - National Research Council (NAS-NRC, and tentative plans were made to initiate the program. However decreasing funds in CB, growing criticism of the CB program., and our reluctance to involve the NAS NRC in such a controversial endeavor have led us to postpone it for the past 2 years.
It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaked lest it lead to yet another method of massive killing of large populations. On the other hand, without the sure scientific knowledge that such a weapon is possible, and an understanding of the ways it could be done. there is little that can be done to devise defensive measures. Should an enemy develop it there is little doubt that this is an important area of potential military technological inferiority in which there is no adequate research program.
"Letter of Transmittal"
Commission on Population Growth and the American Future
726 Jackson Place, N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20506
March 27, 1972
To the President and Congress of the United States:
I have the honor to transmit for your consideration the Final Report, containing the findings and recommendations, of the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future, pursuant to Sec. 8, PL 91-213.
After two years of concentrated effort, we have concluded that, in the long run, no substantial benefits will result from further growth of the Nation’s population, rather that the gradual stabilization of our population through voluntary means would contribute significantly to the Nation’s ability to solve its problems. We have looked for, and have not found, any convincing economic argument for continued population growth. The health of our country does not depend on it, nor does the vitality of business nor the welfare of the average person.
The recommendations offered by this Commission are directed towards increasing public knowledge of the causes and please="" acknowledge="" and="" use="" a="" link="" to="" website<="" hide="">consequences of population change, facilitating and guiding the processes of population movement, maximizing information about human reproduction and its consequences for the family, and enabling individuals to avoid unwanted fertility.
To these ends we offer this report in the hope that our findings and recommendations will stimulate serious consideration of an issue that is of great consequence to present and future generations.
Respectfully submitted for the Commission,
John D. Rockefeller 3rd, Chairman
The President
The President of the Senate
The Speaker of the House of Representatives
John D. Rockefeller 3rd, ChairmanThe Report Of The Commission On Population Growth And The American Future
March 27, 1972
John D. Rockefeller Family
The Commission
Chairman - John D. Rockefeller 3rd
Vice Chairman - Grace Olivare - Executive Director, Food for All, Inc.
Chairman - John D. Rockefeller 3rd
Vice Chairman - Grace Olivare - Executive Director, Food for All, Inc.
Vice Chairman - Christian N. Ramsey, Jr., M.D. - President, The Institute for the Study of Health and Society
Joseph D. Beasley, M.D. The Edward Wisner Professor of Public Health - Tulane University Medical Center
Joseph D. Beasley, M.D. The Edward Wisner Professor of Public Health - Tulane University Medical Center
David E. Bell - Executive Vice President, The Ford Foundation
David E. Bell - Executive Vice President, The Ford Foundation
Bernard Berelson - President, The Population Council
Bernard Berelson - President, The Population Council
Arnita Young Boswell - Associate Field Work Professor - School of Social Service Administration, University of Chicago
Margaret Bright - Professor, Dept. of Behavioral Sciences and Dept. of Epidemiology School of Hygiene and Public Health - The Johns Hopkins University
Arnita Young Boswell - Associate Field Work Professor - School of Social Service Administration, University of Chicago
Margaret Bright - Professor, Dept. of Behavioral Sciences and Dept. of Epidemiology School of Hygiene and Public Health - The Johns Hopkins University
Marilyn Brant Chandler - Housewife, Volunteer, Student
Marilyn Brant Chandler - Housewife, Volunteer, Student
Paul B. Cornely, M.D. - Professor, Dept. of Community Health Practice, College of Medicine - Howard University
Paul B. Cornely, M.D. - Professor, Dept. of Community Health Practice, College of Medicine - Howard University
Assistant to the Executive Medical Officer
Assistant to the Executive Medical Officer
Welfare and Retirement Fund United Mine Workers of America
Alan Cranston - United States Senator - California
Welfare and Retirement Fund United Mine Workers of America
Alan Cranston - United States Senator - California
Lawrence A. Davis - President, Arkansas Agricultural, Mechanical & Normal College
Lawrence A. Davis - President, Arkansas Agricultural, Mechanical & Normal College
- The Medical Mafia: The truth about the Rockefeller drug empire
- The Merchants of aids
- The Aids Conspiracy
- 1969: Department of Defence appropriation HR 15090 to create a virus similar to HIV
- 1985:The Strecker Memorandum video - Aids was made as a bio weapon
- 1987: United States Patent 4,647,773: Gallo: for the production of the AIDS virus
- 1990: Aids is man made- Bill Cooper
- Gallo and Litton bionetics contractors for the US Government, creater of AIDS: Video
- Graves: Dr. Boyd Graves Web Site
- Graves: Letter to Ninth US Circuit Court
- Graves: Alex Jones Interview
HIV/AIDS The Untold Story. The Genecide Theory
An early version of the AIDS-as-biowarfare theory was based on the work of two East German scientists, Jakob and Lilli Segal, published by the Soviet news agency Tass on March 30, 1987. The Segals claimed that HIV could not have evolved naturally, being in fact an artificial splice between visna virus (a retrovirus that infects the nervous system of sheep) and HTLV-1 (the first retrovirus known to infect humans). This splice, they asserted, was created at the notorious CBW lab at Fort Detrick, Maryland, and then tested on prisoners in the area.
On World AIDS Day, Doctor Says More Pediatrics AIDS Drugs Needed Voice of America - 21 hours ago By Joe DeCapua HIV, the AIDS virus, not only infects adults, but also affects many children. Millions have become orphans, and many are infected at birth.
33 million people live with HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. 190 countries around the world recognize this day to raise awareness that the battle is not over in the fight against the world’s number one health threat.
An International Conference on AIDs will be held in Africa, December 3 through 7.
In the U.S., the Black AIDS Institute is asking the Obama administration to set up a domestic funding program for HIV/AIDS prevention, according to BET.The institute says this is increasingly a black issue as about half of the over one million Americans living with HIV or AIDS are black.
Increasingly women and girls are finding themselves part of the growing numbers, with about 11 percent of newly reported AIDS cases contracted either through sex with infected men or injected drug use. African American woman accounted for 66 percent of the newly diagnosed cases in 2005, according to theCenters for Disease Control and Prevention.
The New York Times, in an editorial, says that the WHO developed a mathematical model predicting what would happen if most adults and adolescents were tested every year for the AIDS virus, and those who were positive were treated immediately with antiretroviral medications. The policy now is to use the drugs after your immune system is depresse
Dr Alan Cantwell
"Smallpox vaccine triggered AIDS virus."
Smallpox vaccines triggered AIDS
On May 11, 1987, The London Times, one of the world's most respected newspapers, published an explosive article entitled, "Smallpox vaccine triggered AIDS virus." The story suggested the smallpox eradication vaccine program sponsored by the WHO was responsible for unleashing AIDS in Africa. Almost 100 million Africans living in central Africa were inoculated by the WHO. The vaccine was held responsible for awakening a "dormant" AIDS virus infection on the continent.
An advisor to the WHO admitted, "Now I believe the smallpox vaccine theory is the explanation for the explosion of AIDS." Robert Gallo, M,D., the co-discoverer of HIV, told The Times, "The link between the WHO program and the epidemic is an interesting and important hypothesis. I cannot say that it actually happened, but I have been saying for some years that the use of live vaccines such as that used for smallpox can activate a dormant infection such as HIV." Despite the tremendous importance of this story, the U.S. media was totally silent on the report, and Gallo never spoke of it again.
In September 1987, at a conference sponsored by the National Health Federation in Monrovia, California, William Campbell Douglass, M.D., bluntly blamed the WHO for murdering Africa with the AIDS virus. In a widely circulated reprint of his talk entitled "W.H.O. Murdered Africa" , he accused the organization of encouraging virologists and molecular biologists to work with deadly animal viruses in an attempt to make an immunosuppressive hybrid virus that would be deadly to humans. From the Bulletin of the World Health Organization (Volume 47, p.259, 1972), he quoted a passage that stated: "An attempt should be made to see if viruses can in fact exert selective effects on immune function. The possibility should be looked into that the immune response to the virus itself may be impaired if the infecting virus damages, more or less selectively, the cell responding to the virus." According to Douglass, "That's AIDS. What the WHO is saying in plain English is Let's cook up a virus that selectively destroys the T-cell system of man, an acquired immune deficiency.'"
Human experiments -
in the 'free world'?
"Glaxo has sponsored at least four medical trials since 1995 using Hispanic and black children at Incarnation. The documents give details of all clinical trials in the US and reveal the experiments sponsored by Glaxo were designed to test the 'safety and tolerance' of Aids medications, some of which have potentially dangerous side effects. Glaxo manufactures a number of drugs designed to treat HIV, including AZT. "
UK firm tried HIV drug on orphans
MUST READ: The house that AIDS built
Human experiments - in the 'free world'?
"Glaxo has sponsored at least four medical trials since 1995 using Hispanic and black children at Incarnation. The documents give details of all clinical trials in the US and reveal the experiments sponsored by Glaxo were designed to test the 'safety and tolerance' of Aids medications, some of which have potentially dangerous side effects. Glaxo manufactures a number of drugs designed to treat HIV, including AZT. " UK firm tried HIV drug on orphans
MUST READ: The house that AIDS built By Liam Scheff This brave article deals with pharmaceutical abuse in a children's home in NYC
It was through Maggiore that I met Mona, whose children, Sean and Dana, have tested HIV-positive. By the state's definition, they're not actually her children; Mona is their great aunt and legal guardian. Her niece, a long-time drug user, was unable to act as a responsible mother, so Sean and Dana were remanded to state foster care. Mona took them back to raise as her own.
When I first spoke with Mona, she was stressed and nervous. Sean had twice been sent to the Incarnation Children's Center (ICC), a "home for HIV positive children" located in Washington Heights. First, as an infant, then again four years ago. And Dana was there until June.
"Why did they take her?" I asked.
"They said I was a negligent parent because I didn't want to give the drugs."
She'd been taking Sean and Dana to a naturopath. That the children were healthy didn't matter. When city agencies found out that the children weren't on the drugs, they took them away for mandatory treatment at a clinic and then transferred them to ICC. There, they were locked up and pumped full of drugs day and night.
"What drugs?"
"AZT, Nevirapine, Epivir, Zerit. All kinds of drugs."
Diseases and National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and huge pharmaceutical companies such as Glaxo, Pfizer, Squibb and Genentech?is to take a trip through the nightmare world of pediatric drug research.
For example, the study called "The Effect of Anti-HIV Treatment on Body Characteristics of HIV-Infected Children" is looking for the causes of "Wasting and Lipodystrophy [fat redistribution]"?by using drugs known to cause wasting and lipodystrophy.
Or consider "The Safety and Effectiveness of Treating Advanced AIDS Patients between the Ages of 4 and 22 with Seven Drugs, Some at Higher than Usual Doses." The seven drugs in the study are all known to cause debilitating, potentially fatal side effects, yet they are administered at "higher than usual doses" in four-year-olds.
Then there's a study with "Stavudine Alone or in Combination with Didanosine." Stavudine plus Didanosine has killed pregnant women.
Or the vaccine study to be administered to children "12 months to 8 years" using "live chicken pox virus," even though one of the consequences of a live virus vaccine can be the disease itself.
Another measures "HIV Levels in Cerebrospinal Fluid." Cerebrospinal fluid can only be gathered from a spinal tap, a dangerous and invasive procedure.
There's even a study on HIV-negative children born to HIV-infected mothers that uses an experimental HIV vaccine.
Mona was never informed that Sean had once participated in clinical trials at ICC. - more
Is Modern-Day Israel in Bible Prophecy?
Israel’s Link to the Rapture
Thousands expect Israel to play a major role in God’s future plan for earth. What is the Biblical evidence?
Many people today consider the restoration of the Jewish nation in Palestine to be a direct and dramatic fulfillment of Bible prophecy.
Hal Lindsey’s The Late Great Planet Earth, a phenomenal best seller of the last few decades, and Jerry Jenkins and Tim Lahaye’s Lift Behind, along with Bishop T.D. Jakes declares that the end of the world will come within the lifetime of the generation that saw the founding of the Israeli state in 1948, hereby applying the words of Jesus: “This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.” (Matthew 24:34)
Coupled with this fascination with Israel is a novel teaching regarding the return of Jesus, called the “secret rapture.” These books and many other speaks for many today who expect God secretly to take the “church” to heaven prior to the rebuilding of the Jewish Temple on its old site where the sacred Muslim shrine, the Dome of the Rock, now stands. According to this position, after the “church” is “raptured” to heaven, there will be seven years of the worst period of famine, bloodshed, and pestilence ever experienced by man. During this great tribulation the focus will be on God’s dealings with the Jews, who are again given the responsibility for the evangelization of the world.
According to secret-rapture preachers, the battle of Armageddon will climax the end of the seven-year tribulation as the nations of the earth take sides over the future of Israel. When mankind teeters on the brink of incinerating the world, Jesus will return gloriously and save man from self-extinction. At that time Jesus will set up a literal one-thousand-year reign on earth with Jerusalem functioning as the spiritual capital of the world.
Most evangelical periodicals and pulpits teach this view today, and to those who do not know better, it might appear that this prophetic scenario, known as pretribulationism, has been the traditional teaching of the Christian church since New Testament days. Nothing is further from the truth. Be not deceived.. Did the architects of the creation of modern day Israel have any thing to do with the development of the rapture theory? Where did the Rapture theology originate? Is the crisis in the Middle East and the war in the Iraq have anything to do with the erroneous rapture theory? Is there a master conspiracy at work? I will attempt to answer these and many more questions.. in my up coming blogs.
Jewish author, Arthur Koestler has published a 255 page book titled THE THIRTEENTH TRIBEwhich proves the Eastern European Jews are NOT related to Abraham, Isaac …
Are today’s Western Jews really ethnic, Semitic, Biblical Jews, or are most of them descendants of converted Khazars?...This compact, interesting book…examines tragic-ironic implications in [this question] for modern history…It should fascinate.” –Edmund Fuller, Wall Street Journal
“Koestler marshals the evidence in a clear and convincing way. He tells a good story, pulling together materials from medieval Muslims and Jewish travelers, scholarly controversy and the mysterious lore of the Khazars.” –Raymond Sokolov, Newsweek
CRIME AGAINST NATURE
Stomach-Turning Photos Show Animals Caught In Oil Spill
BP Moves To Cap Well.. Government Still UnderestimatingSize Of Spill.. Obama's Updates Didn't Have Spill Estimates..
CEO May Be Forced Out.. Spill Timeline.. Join A Meetup..
BIG NEWS PAGE.. LIVE VIDEO.. MORE PHOTOS..
- Rothschild – Jehovah Witness and Hitler Connection
- Rothschild – NWO – Israel and Masonry
- Rothschild – Opus Dei Connection To Israel
- Rothschild and Jehovah Witness (Illuminati -Russell Bloodline)
- Rothschild and the Red Shield – Israel
- Rothschild Bloodline
- Rothschild family used the Illuminati as a means to achieving their goal of world-wide dominance
AIDS/HIV, British Israel, Cecil Rhodes, conspiracy, current events, de Rothschild, Depopulation, Dr. Boyd Graves, EUGENICS, Genocide, Health, Health Reform, NWO, PL91-213, Robert Gallo, ROCKEFELLER, United Nation, WHO
Jesuits, Jesus, Joyer Meyer Ministries, Juanita Bynum, Juanita Bynum-Thomas Weeks, KABBALLAH, Kabbalah, Kenneth copeland ministries, Pastor Tony Smith, Paul Lelonde, Rex Hubbard, Rick Warren, ZOA, hilton sutton, hinson, jerry rose, jesse duplantis, lee gaymon, post tribulation, pre-tribulation, robert campbell | Tagged: 3ABN AIPAC, America Values, AMF, Anglican Church, Anti-Christ, Anti-Christ Doctrine, Anti-Protestant, Anti-Reformation, apostacy, apostasy, Armageddon, Armageddon book, Armegeddon, Arno Froese, Assemblies of God, Baal worship, babylon, Baphomet, Barack Obama, Basilea Schlink, Bean Joseph Reyes, benny hinn, BIBLE, BIBLE TALK, BIBLEPROBE,BibleTalk, Bill Hybils, Billy Graham, Billy Joe Daugherty, Billy Joe Daughterty, Binny Hinn, Bishop Charles Blake, Bishop Charles Green, Bishop Eddie Long, Bishop Neil Ellis, Bishop T.D. Jakes,Bishop Thomas Weeks, blackie gonzalez, Blessed Hope, BnaiBrith, Bob Jones, book, branch of david, Bridges for Peace, British Israel, BULLINGER, CABALAH, Cabbala, Catholic, Catholicism,CCJ, Charles Capps, Charles Green, charles phillips, Charles Stanly, Chistianity, Christian,Christian Coalition, Christian Science, Christian Word Ministries, Christian Zionism, Chuck Smith,church, clarence larkin, cliff ford, COGIC, conspiracy, Cornerstone Church, Creflo Dollar, Creflo Dollar Ministries, Creflo Dollar World Changers Ministries, cult rapture, current events, Cyrus Scofield, CZOA, Dallas Theological Seminary, Dan Bohler, Dan Brown, Dan Kohler, daniel bohler,Dave Hunt, David Pawson, DaVinci Code, Demy, Dereck Prince, DISPENSATION, Doctrine, Donald Hilliard Ministries, Doug Kreiger, drosnin michael, Druids, Dwight L Moody, Dwright L. Moody,end-time-events, end-times, end-times events, Ernest Agley, Ernest Angley, Evangelical, false-doctrine, Floyd Flake, Frank Able, Frank Wright, Franklin Graham, Fredrick Price, Freemason,frontier research publications, Futurism, garth coonch, Gary Bauer, Gaza Massacre, Gerald Falwell, GJCN, Global University, God, Golden Dawn, GOSPEL, Grant Jefferies, Grant Jeffery,Gravel, Haaretz, Hal Lindsey, happy caldwell, Haram al-Sharif, Harpazo, Hillery Clinton, hilton,hinson, history, Holy Land International Christian Embassy, Hope of the World, Ignatius Press,Ignitius Loyola, Illuminati, International Fellowship of Christians and Jews, InTouch, Israel Christian Advocacy Council, Israel jerry rose, J. Reyes, j.vernon mcgee, jack van impe ministries, James DeLoach, James Kennedy, jan markell, Jane Hanson - Aglow International, Janet Parshall,
//
overall Top 100 uspolitics
- Anti-Christ Doctrine, Assemblies Of Gog, Assemblies of God, BULLINGER,Bible Prophecy, Bill McCartney, Billy Graham, Billy Joe Daugherty, Billy Joe Daughterty, Bishop Chandler D. Owens, Bishop Charels E. Blake, Bishop Charles Blake, Bishop Dale Bronner, Bishop Eddie Long, Bishop George D. McKinney, Bishop George Dallas McKinney, Bishop J.B. Hackworth, Bishop Jacob Cohen, Bishop James C. Austin, Bishop Lee Vicker Broom, Bishop N. Wyoming Wells, Bishop Neil Ellis, Bishop Noel Jones, Bishop Paul Morton, Bishop R.D. Edward Goodwin, Bishop Randy White, Bishop Rick Hawkins, Bishop Roosevelt Dunn, Bishop Roy L.H. Winbush, Bishop Samuel Green, Bishop T.D. Jakes, Bishop Thomas Weeks, Bishop Thomas Weeks III, Blessed Hope, Bob Jones, Bob Larson, Bridges for Peace, British Israel, COGIC, CTN,CUFI, Cabbala, Calvin Butts, Carl Henry, Catholic, Cecil Rhodes, Charles Green, Christian Word Ministries, Christian Zionism, Christian Zionism Israel, Chuck Colson, Chuck Missler, Chuck Smith,Church of God In Christ, Creflo Dollar, Creflo Dollar Ministries, Creflo Dollar World Changers Ministries, Cyrus Scofield, DISPENSATION, DL Lindsey, DaVinci Code, Dale Bronner, Dallas Theological Seminary, Dan Bohler, Dan Brown, David Allen Lewis Ministries, David Jeremiah,David Pawson, DeDwayne Rudd, Deeper Revelation, Dereck Prince, Derek Prince, Dominion Now, Don Pearce, Don Perkins, Donald Hilliard, Donald Hilliard Ministries, Doug Kreiger, Dr. Leonard Lovett, Dual Covenant, Dwight L Moody, E.V.Hill, Earl Paulk, Eddie Long, Elder Derrick Hutchons, Ernest Angley, False Prophecy, False Teaching, Forrest Oilar, Foursqure, Franklin Graham, Fred Price, Freemason, Full Gospel, Futurism, Gail Riplinger, Gary Bauer, Geoge Bloomer, George Jeffrey, Gerald Falwell, Glen Plummer, Global Destiny, Golden Dawn, Gordon MacDonald, Grant Jefferies, Grant Jeffery, Hal Lindsey, Harold Ray, Huie Rogers, Illuminati, J.V. Impe, JINSA, JN Haynes, Jack Hayford, Jack Van Impe, Jacob Boehme, James DeLoach, James Kennedy, James Robinson, Jane Hanson - Aglow International, Jentezen Franklin, Jeremiah Wright, Jerry Savelle Ministries International, Jesuits, Jimmie Black, Joe Aldrich, Joe Koevering,Joe Van Koevering, Joel Rosenberg, Joesph Reyes, John Ankerberg, John Darby, John Hagee